RadarURL
Skip to content
조회 수 190 추천 수 0 댓글 0
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄

In the field of Ethernet switch connection, link aggregation is a technology to combine multiple ports in parallel between different network switches. It functions to expand bandwidth cost-effectively and to provide redundancy in link failure. However, the umbrella term “link aggregation” is rather a broad terminology containing various conceptions: Link Aggregation Control Protocol, Link Aggregation Group, MLAG, 802.3ad, 802.1AX, etc. Among them the issue of LAG vs LACP confuses many people. Here we introduce LAG vs LACP in sequence and compare LAG vs LACP to illustrate their relationships and differences.

LAG-vs-LACP-What-is-the-Difference.jpg

 

 

LAG vs LACP: What Is LAG?

LAG (Link Aggregation Group) is an actual technique or instance for link aggregation. A Link Aggregation Group forms when we connect multiple ports in parallel between two switches and configure them as LAG. As thus LAG builds up multiple links between two switches, which expands bandwidth. Besides, it provides link-level redundancy in network failure and load-balance traffic. Even if one link fails, the remaining links between the two switches will still be running. They also take over those traffic supposed to traverse via the failed one, so data packet won’t get lost.

LAG vs LACP: What Is LACP?

LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) is a control protocol to set up LAGs automatically. So you can choose to build a static LAG without LACP. Or you can choose to set up a dynamic LAG by using LACP. Simply put, LACP is not a link aggregation instance but a protocol for defining it. LACP enables LAG to transfer from static LAG to dynamic LAG, which allows information exchange of the link aggregation between the LAG component network switches. The information is delivered as packet in Link Aggregation Control Protocol Data Units (LACPDUs). And each port on both switches can be configured to be active or passive via the control protocol to be either preferential to transfer LACPDUs or not.

LAG Implementation Scenario

Since LACP is only a protocol for Link Aggregation Group. We’ll omit the LAG vs LACP differentiation to see LAG implementation scenario by FS.COM. Taking the LAG between two gigabit PoE network switches and another 10GbE fiber switch as example. While simply connecting one port on each gigabit PoE switch with one cable, we get 1GE bandwidth. However, when you double link, triple link or higher multiples, the bandwidth will become 2GE, 3GE and so on.

Further, to uplink a backbone core switch, we can use 4 fiber patch cables with corresponding modules to link the 48 port gigabit PoE switch 10GE SFP+ ports and the 10GbE fiber optic switch. Then the uplink bandwidth on the S1600-48T4S expands to 40GE. In the case two LAGs form on the 48 port PoE switch. The link upper limit to form a LAG and the number of LAGs between two switches vary from vendor and switch models.

LAG-vs-LACP-link-aggregation-implement-scenario-by-fs-PoE-switch-and-fiber-switch.jpg

 

 

Figure 1: Linking 4 1GE ports in parallel on FS 48 port PoE switch and 24 port PoE switch to set up a LAG, which boosts bandwidth from 1000Mbps to 4 × 1000Mbps. In this photo two LAGs have been implemented on the FS 48 port PoE switch.

LAG vs LACP : Link Aggregation Advantages to Expand Bandwidth

Whether LAG deploying Link Aggregation Control Protocol or not, it requires no expensive hardware upgrade. Therefore Link Aggregation Group provides a cost-effective solution for bandwidth expansion. Stacking switch is indeed an advanced method to obtain higher bandwidth. However, it is restricted to stackable switch and does not support separate placing. To buy a higher speed switch like a 10GbE switch is also an direct and effective solution. But for ordinary users this hardware upgrade is over budget.

LAG vs LACP: What’s the Difference?

  • Link Aggregation Group is a practical instance of link aggregation whereas LACP is a protocol for auto-configuring and maintaining LAG.
  • LAG without Link Aggregation Control Protocol is a static configuration, in which each pair of ports in a LAG require manual configuration respectively. However, LACP enabled ports are dynamic configuration, which enable to auto-configure into trunk groups when building LAG.
  • When talking about LAG vs LACP, one usually refer to static LAG without LACP vs dynamic LAG with LACP. Generally speaking, dynamic LAG configuration owns advantages over static LAG configuration for automatic failover occur and mutual dynamic configuration. In static link aggregation, LAG cannot detach configuration or cabling errors so as to cause unnecessary network troubles.

Conclusion

LAG vs LACP issue is put forward for the confusing conception between them. LAG is an actual instance for link aggregation. LACP is a control protocol to enable LAG automatically configure network switch ports, detach link failure and activate failover. So LAG encompasses both static LAG configuration and dynamic LAG configuration on the basis of whether employing optional Link Aggregation Control Protocol or not. As a whole, Link Aggregation Group is a cost-effective way to expand bandwidth over switch stacking and other hardware upgrade methods. For minimizing network link failure, LACP enabled dynamic LAG configuration over static LAG is a much better solution to go.

 

출처 : http://www.fiber-optic-components.com/llag-vs-lacp-relationship-difference.html

 

TAG •
?

List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
» LAG vs LACP: What’s the Difference? JAESOO 2019.01.24 190
25 LACP Active/Passive, Dynamic/Static JAESOO 2019.01.24 414
24 티밍 (Link Aggregation)에 대해 알아보자 JAESOO 2019.01.24 147
23 STP (스패닝 트리 프로토콜) JAESOO 2017.11.14 1038
22 [스위치] 스패닝 트리 ( STP - Spanning Tree Protocol ) JAESOO 2017.11.10 493
21 STP(Spanning-Tree Protocol) 동작원리 JAESOO 2017.11.08 491
20 H514G 모뎀 대신 사용가능한 허브 iptime H5005-IGMP JAESOO 2015.08.28 1627
19 케이블 교체 공사없이 제공되는 기가급 (300~500Mbps) 인터넷 서비스란? JAESOO 2015.08.28 801
18 [네트워크 트러블 슈팅 ④] 네트워크 장비별 트러블 슈팅 JAESOO 2015.06.15 954
17 백본스위치(backbone switch)란? JAESOO 2015.06.15 5058
16 Cisco L3 이중화 - 2. 장애 시나리오 및 테스트 JAESOO 2015.06.15 1580
15 [White Paper] 업무연속성과 해재복구 계획 수립 JAESOO 2015.06.15 276
14 Switch , VLAN , VTP JAESOO 2015.06.15 465
13 Switch의 Loop방지기술 - STP JAESOO 2015.06.15 507
12 Router 와 L3 Switch의 차이 JAESOO 2015.04.16 1357
11 스위치 성능인 PPS(Packet per Sec, 초당 처리 가능한 최대 패킷 수) 계산법 JAESOO 2014.11.27 801
10 PPS(Packet per Sec, 초당 처리 가능한 최대 패킷 수) 계산법 JAESOO 2014.11.27 2887
9 [Switch 기능] STP, RSTP, MSTP에 관해서… JAESOO 2014.10.21 1368
8 네트워크 장비 L2 · L3 · L4 · L7 JAESOO 2014.10.20 1341
7 STP보호기술 2 - BPDU Filtering 와 Loop Guard JaeSoo 2014.03.24 915
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 Next
/ 2

PageViews   Today : 322   Yesterday : 1,692   Total : 20,295,129  /  Counter Status   Today : 99   Yesterday : 414   Total : 1,551,061
Site Info   Member : 248  /  Total documents : 1,245   New documents : 0  /  Total comments : 27

Edited by JAESOO

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

나눔글꼴 설치 안내


이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소